www.iraqbodycount.org


wPuri sermonis amator
Politics and Pop Culture.

And occasionally informative, amusing, or bizzare non sequiturs.

Matt's in charge here, others can post.


wNews and Propaganda:
Salon
Slate
/.
The Nation
The American Prospect
Cursor
Bartcop
The Washington Post
Tom Paine
Independant Media Center
Kuro5hin
AntiWar
Fark
MediaWhoresOnline
The Hamster
The Guardian (UK)
The Memory Hole
ABC's The Note
Common Dreams
BBC News
Al Jazeera


wBlogs:
Matthew Yglesias
Kevin Drum
Atrios
Daily Kos
Change For Missouri
Tom Tomorrow
Wil Wheaton
uggabugga
Politics, Law, Autism
Joshua Micah Marshall
Roger Ailes
moby
William Gibson
Digby
Counterspin Central
Dave Barry
Pandagon
The Rittenhouse Review
Brad DeLong
TBOGG
Ted Barlow
Neal Pollack
Eric Alterman
The Bloviator
MyDD
Official Dean Blog
Unofficial Dean Blog
Joe Conason
STL - Instead Of War
Gary Hart
Mark Kleiman
Jeanne d'Arc
Thomas Spencer
Decnavda's Dialectic
Billmon's Whiskey Bar
Adam Felber
Iraq Democracy Watch
Dear Raed
MaxSpeak, You Listen!
TomPaine.com
Dennis Kucinich
Donkey Rising
Daryl Cagle


wMovies:
Hollywood Stock Exchange
Box Office Prophets
Ain't It Cool News
Internet Movie Database
Rotten Tomatoes
Fetal Film Report
Superhero Hype
The Force


wFolks:
Weston
Andy Bell
Violet


wComics:
Get Your War On
Mega Tokyo
Mac Hall
Penny Arcade
Boy Meets Boy
Sluggy Freelance
Something Positive


wMeetups:
Democracy For America
/.


wStuff to buy:
NBY First Amendment Shoppe
Perceval Press
Unofficial Dean Stuff
The Dean Mart


wReference & Miscellany:
U.S. State Department 2002 Human Rights Report
Environmental Scorecard
Merriam-Webster Online
Wellstone!
Unofficial Paul Krugman Archive
Bill of Rights
The Javascript Source
Ari & I
Everything2
Pigfucker for President
Electoral College Calculator
Dean Picture Archive
Tax Policy Center
Coalition Military Deaths
Internet Modern History Sourcebook


wArchives:


-- HOME --



This page is powered by Blogger. Why isn't yours?
wWednesday, October 29, 2003


Well, it seems I'm still on the list, so I might as well post this blantant use of racism to further his stance in the polls: Sharpton Calls Dean's Agenda 'Anti-Black'

This is the most pathetic attack I've seen in a while, aside from the "rats" subliminal messages from the last election.


Howard Dean's opposition to affirmative action, his current support for the death penalty and historic support of the NRA's [National Rifle Association's] agenda amounts to an anti-black agenda that will not sell in communities of color in this country,"


Uh... right... because, you know, wanting to make affirmative action based more on poor people of all races rather than based on race itself is such a bad idea....

He said his comments were in response to a news report yesterday that Rep. Jesse L. Jackson Jr. (D-Ill.) plans to endorse Dean, the former Vermont governor and presumed front-runner for the 2004 Democratic nomination


Ah... it all makes sense now. Jackson, a black man, is supporting a white man, and not Sharpton or Braun. 'Cause, you know, all white people are eeeeeevil KKK members out to kill all black people in some ethnic clensing frenzy.

Fucking racist bullshit. Why is this acceptable in our society? It doesn't make any sense. Doesn't he realize he's furthering BUSH in the polls by attacking his own team?! Is he really THAT stupid?!

Hmm... I don't think I'll make too much of a case about the Tawana Brawley thing, acutally... I don't know if I want to open that "kill whitey" can of worms.

::waits for the 'but white people really are evil' flame messages::

posted by Anonymous at 6:15 PM
(0) comments


wTuesday, September 30, 2003


It's official. I'm going to Archon as Black Mage.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:24 PM
(0) comments


w


Map to Mordor

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 3:53 PM
(0) comments


w


Clark's got a blog... Official Clark '04 Campaign Blog: Generally Speaking... and it sucks. Cute name, though.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:36 PM
(0) comments


w


This is just disgusting: Full Metal Jacket
Suzanne Werfelman is a mother and a teacher who has been shopping for individual body armor. This is not in response to threats from her elementary-class students in Sciota, Pa.; it's a desperate attempt to protect her son in Iraq.

Like many other U.S. service members in Iraq, her son was given a Vietnam-era flak jacket that cannot stop the type of weapons used today. It appears that parents across the country are now purchasers of body armor because of the failure of the military to supply soldiers with modern vests.

Werfelman's son, Army Spc. Richard Murphy, is a military policeman in Iraq. He was also one of my law students last year before being sent off for a 20-month stint. Upon their arrival, members of Murphy's unit were shocked to learn that they would be given the old Vietnam-era vests rather than the modern Interceptor vest. (They were also given unarmored Humvees, which are vulnerable to even small-arms fire.) Military officials admit that the standard flak jacket could not reliably stop a bullet, including AK-47 ammunition, used in Iraq and the most common ammunition in the world.

Developed in the late 1990s, the Interceptor vest is made of layered sheets of Kevlar with pockets in front and back for ceramic plates to protect vital organs. These vests — one-third lighter than the old ones — have stopped machine-gun bullets, shrapnel and other ordnance.

They can mean the difference between living and dying, which was made all too clear to Sgt. Zachariah Byrd, a soldier with the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, who was shot four times with AK-47 bullets (twice in the chest and twice in his arms) when his unit was ambushed. The vest protected his chest and he survived. Byrd had been issued a standard flak jacket and, if he had been wearing it during the attack, he'd probably be dead. However, at the beginning of the patrol, his buddy who was driving that night gave his Interceptor vest to Byrd — a passing kindness that saved Byrd's life.

Others don't have the Interceptor option — including some of the soldiers in Murphy's unit who are still wearing flak jackets. Congress has received reports of soldiers killed while wearing the old flak jackets. One from a mother related how three soldiers in her son's unit were killed while wearing the outmoded vests. The unit reportedly had only 30 modern vests for 120 men. Army Staff Sgt. Dave Harris wrote a letter to Stars and Stripes that related how his friend, Mike Quinn, was killed in Fallouja. Quinn's unit didn't have enough vests, so he gave his to a young soldier. The decision saved the young soldier's life, but resulted in Quinn's death when he was shot.
(via Brad DeLong)

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:49 AM
(0) comments


w


Wesley Clark: Rhodes scholar, four-star general, NATO commander, time-travel fanatic? :
During a whirlwind campaign swing Saturday through New Hampshire, Clark, the newest Democratic presidential candidate, gave supporters one of the first glimpses into his views on technology.

'We need a vision of how we're going to move humanity ahead, and then we need to harness science to do it,' Clark told a group of about 50 people in Newcastle attending a house party -- a tradition in New Hampshire presidential politics that enables well-connected voters to get an up-close look at candidates.

Then, the 58-year-old Arkansas native, who retired from the military three years ago, dropped something of a bombshell on the gathering.

'I still believe in e=mc², but I can't believe that in all of human history, we'll never ever be able to go beyond the speed of light to reach where we want to go,' said Clark. 'I happen to believe that mankind can do it.'

'I've argued with physicists about it, I've argued with best friends about it. I just have to believe it. It's my only faith-based initiative.' Clark's comment prompted laughter and applause from the gathering. "
Hmmm. Isn't this fellow interesting?

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:07 AM
(0) comments


w


Paul's back: Who's Sordid Now?

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:41 AM
(0) comments


w


The Plame affair continues - my favorite blogging is coming from Billmon, and JMM keeps coming up with new tidbits (he interviewed Ambassador Wilson a few weeks ago, and seems to be in contact with him now)...

That smell in the water is blood.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:17 AM
(0) comments


wMonday, September 29, 2003


Candidates and Religion

I learned this weekend that Howard Dean switched from Episcopalianism to Congregationalism because his local Episcopal church opposed building a bike path around Lake Champlain. Easy enough to understand - I've heard Dean mention before that his faith is of a personal nature and not dependant upon sectarian doctrine. Heck, his wife's Jewish and they raised the kids Jewish.

More complex is Wes Clark's switch from Southern Baptist to Catholicism. I've read a few times that he switched during Vietnam (although no reason was given) and I've seen elsewhere that his wife is Catholic and he converted for her. Again, easy enough to understand, especially if he wasn't too engrossed in the theological differences between the two. But the differences are pretty stark, even for the casual theologian.

One of the fundamental differences between Protestantism and Catholicism is the latter's belief in the intercession of the Saints. When I was a child I'd pray to Jesus, or through my sister (who, dying before she could know sin, is technically a non-canonized Saint), or through the Apostle Matthew (the only literate Apostle, the nerd of the early disciples).

I'm reading Clark's book now, and gaining an appreciation of the fellow you don't see on TV. And Wes Clark prays through St. Michael.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 4:43 PM
(0) comments


w


If you want to listen to Howard Dean on the telephone tonight, be over at my house around 6:30.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 3:12 PM
(0) comments


w


This is kinda fun to watch - the Plame Affair is exploding in the left side of the blogosphere.

I don't have much to add, and wouldn't want to show excessive glee at finally catching these bastards at doing something. After all, there's still a very real danger that some CIA assets got burned because of this.

Full rundown from The Horse.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:38 AM
(0) comments


wFriday, September 26, 2003


Okay guys, the overtime vote is on Oct. 1st. If you haven’t done anything yet, you need to do it quickly! Honor the people who died for the sake of unions and worker’s rights by demanding that the House follow suit with the Senate and stop Bush’s tyranny.

posted by Anonymous at 11:46 AM
(0) comments


w


Quote Of The Day
"Don't get too personal, brother Howard."
-Al Sharpton, at yesterday's debate


posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:36 AM
(0) comments


w


Report: Cheney still has financial interest in Halliburton:
"A congressional report concludes that, under federal ethics standards, Vice President Dick Cheney still has a financial interest in Halliburton, the energy services company he used to run. "
Well, duh.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 8:42 AM
(0) comments


wThursday, September 25, 2003


Dixie Chicks: Still Hot

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 3:01 PM
(0) comments


w


Michael Moore.com : Michael Moore responds to the wacko attackos...

Is Andy around? Is he reading this?

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:34 PM
(0) comments


w


Yesterday's code explained over on my livejournal.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 1:34 PM
(0) comments


w


Dean declares war on "King George":
"Two hundred and two Septembers after the creation of our Bill of Rights, Attorney General John Ashcroft drafted a document that has eroded our Constitutional rights and broken down the mutual trust between the American people and their government -- and between Americans and each other -- by making suspects out of all of us.

That is not the act of a patriot.

A true Patriot Act is not born out of fear, but out of trust; it is not born out of division, but out of community; it is not born out of suspicion, but out of faith in each of us.

We need to remind this administration what a Patriot Act is.

A neighbor lends a hand to a friend in need -- that is a Patriot Act.

A mother struggles for her children's future -- that is a Patriot Act.

An immigrant becomes a member of our American family -- that is a Patriot Act.

Men and women risk life and limb on behalf of our country through our armed services -- that is a Patriot Act.

Americans come together as a community and as a country to declare their values, their rights, and their very independence. That is a Patriot Act, as it was in 1776 and as it is over two hundred years later, and as it will be, through our actions, over two hundred years from now... "
It's Salon, but I liked it enough to quote it.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:52 AM
(0) comments


wWednesday, September 24, 2003


The Good Guys in Israel:
Twenty-seven reserve pilots in the Israeli Air Force presented a signed petition tonight saying that they would not take part in "illegal and immoral" strikes in Palestinian areas in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The airstrikes, aimed at Hamas militants, sometimes kill Palestinian civilians.

"We refuse to participate in air force attacks on civilian populations," said the letter, which was sent to the head of the air force, Maj. Gen. Dan Halutz. "We refuse to continue harming innocent civilians."
(via Billmon - click his link, because he's sexy.)

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:25 PM
(0) comments


w


Divine justice comes forth.

posted by Anonymous at 7:03 PM
(0) comments


w


IF YOU CAN DECODE THIS, I WILL GIVE YOU A PRIZE

HalLibuRtOndIeenERGIeseRVIcEfirMADIevoMvizEpEAsiDenTenDIckCHenDyhatEmPfaNGenmEhRvorANGeGangEnwUrDEAlsmILL

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 3:40 PM
(0) comments


w


Awesome

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 1:09 PM
(0) comments


w


Kerry brings up rival's GOP votes:
"Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry warned Tuesday that retired Army Gen. Wesley Clark, whose entry into the race for the Democratic presidential nomination has reshaped the campaign, will have to answer for his past support of Republicans Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan.

Kerry, a Vietnam veteran who lost his claim as the only presidential candidate with real combat experience when Clark entered the field last week, drew a direct contrast between his own ''consistent'' record and that of the retired general who only recently decided he was a Democrat.

''I know that when he voted for Reagan and he voted for Nixon, I was fighting against both of them,'' Kerry said in an interview with The Herald amid a daylong fundraising trip to Miami.

''I think your life history is what you're offering people,'' added Kerry, who was placed on Nixon's infamous enemies list for his antiwar activism upon his return from Vietnam. ``My life history is I fought Reagan, fought Nixon, fought the war in Vietnam, fought their struggle against civil rights. I fought for civil rights, and I fought against their tax cuts for the wealthy.''"
Sure, Kerry voted for the war. But Clark voted for Nixon

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:15 AM
(0) comments


w


The Onion
Church, State Joyfully Reunite After 230-Year Trial Separation

WASHINGTON, DC—Following a two-and-a-quarter-century-long trial separation, Church and State reunited in the U.S. Department of Justice press room Monday. "Even through all the bad times, I knew there had to be a way to get these two old friends back together," Attorney General John Ashcroft said. "With a little counseling and faith-based intervention, I knew Church and State would work it out. It was meant to be." Effective Oct. 15, prayer will be mandatory in public schools and congressional sessions will open with Holy Communion.


posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:46 AM
(0) comments


w


The West's Favorite 'Democrat' (washingtonpost.com):
"Instead of bringing law and order to the nation, as Putin promised to do, he has brought Russian-style order without any law. High-profile investigations launched by the 'law enforcement' authorities are often either politically motivated or intended to redistribute the ownership of property in the interest of Kremlin favorites. According to the CEOs of several businesses, who spoke on condition of anonymity, the character of bribes has changed for the worse. 'Three years ago,' one of my longtime sources told me, 'an FSB [successor to the KGB] guy came and asked $500,000 for 'the right to live and work in the country,' as he put it then. Now they come and request a share of the business.' Several others confirmed the pattern. "
Three years ago, in a Republican debate:
"We know that he was an apparatchik. We know that he was a member of the KGB. We know that he came to power because of the military brutality and massacre that's been taking place in Russia today – I mean in Chechnya today. We know that he worked a deal with Yeltsin, so that Yeltsin would have immunity, and he would be assured of the presidency, rather than basically a contested – I'm very concerned about Mr. Putin. I'm afraid Mr. Putin might be one of those who wants to make the trains run on time."
- Sen. John McCain
Tolerating Putin's Evil Empire - Why Bush is ignoring the latest Russian crackdown. :
"Russia's role in the war on terrorism will be at the top of the agenda when U.S. President George W. Bush meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin later this week. Bush wants Russian troops in Iraq, help with North Korea, and cooperation with derailing Iran's nuclear aspirations. In return, he'll illustrate the harsh reality behind U.S. rhetoric about promoting democracy by largely ignoring the ways in which Putin has been undermining its foundations in Russia. "


posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:09 AM
(0) comments


wTuesday, September 23, 2003


Here's the rough draft of the essay. Arg, matey.

posted by Anonymous at 7:30 PM
(0) comments


w


Huh? I'm not 100% sure what is meant by this. Do they mean that members have to have a bank ID card? I already have one and I actually like it, it's one more way to stop identity theives(my bank is based out of a military complex). Or, does this mean background checks are going to be made for all new customers?

posted by Anonymous at 7:12 PM
(0) comments


w


Goodness, this is silly (Of course, I'll be at one of the local House Parties).

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 12:47 PM
(0) comments


w


How a regular guy gets homeless

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:40 AM
(0) comments


w


Anti-Bush Moderates (washingtonpost.com):
"Ask a Democrat about 2002 and it won't take long before the name Max Cleland comes up. Cleland is the former Georgia senator who lost three limbs in Vietnam. Because he favored some union and civil service protections in the homeland security bill, Cleland was attacked in a vicious campaign ad showing pictures of Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. Cleland lost, and Democrats are still furious over the treatment of this war hero and political moderate. This is personal, not ideological. "
Hey, E.J. gets it. Good for him.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:51 AM
(0) comments


w


Quote Of The Day
"Tonight we congratulate television news for becoming us - mindless ratings whores.
-- Jon Stewart, at the Emmys


posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:27 AM
(0) comments


w


Dr. Krugman is still on his vacation/book tour, so no new column today. There are some interviews up at the unofficial site though, if you miss your Tuesday morning PK.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:03 AM
(0) comments


wMonday, September 22, 2003


Help! I have to write an essay about any aspect of Descartes "Meditations" and I have a 3 non-internet source minimum(although 1 can be the textbook). I'm thinking of tearing down meditation 3(proof of god) but I'm not sure where to start. Please, someone help me ^^

posted by Anonymous at 3:44 PM
(0) comments


w


FYI x2

It's been 735 days since Bush said he'd catch Osama bin Laden 'Dead or Alive.'

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 3:25 PM
(0) comments


w


FYI FROM THE MEXICAN

it costs $3.54/min to call the cook islands, and
$2.94/min to call diego garcia.

-senor A.
Diego is in Italy, and I have no idea why Lou's calling the Cook Islands, but he felt like telling me, so I'm telling you.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:09 AM
(0) comments


wSaturday, September 20, 2003


Costello actually sent back a letter regarding overtime pay specificly. I'm so shocked I feel like framing it.

posted by Anonymous at 7:28 PM
(0) comments


w


Well, my friend Tom just informed me that he's probably going to Iraq in January. Swell.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:14 AM
(0) comments


wFriday, September 19, 2003


Well now, isn't this precious?

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 3:56 PM
(0) comments


w


The $10,000 Bill and Other Large Denominations

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 12:32 PM
(0) comments


w


New Moore book: Dude, Where's My Country?

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:25 AM
(0) comments


w


WTF?

Another Clark Piece:
"Indeed, after caustically comparing the actions of the Bush administration to what he described as the abuses of Richard M. Nixon, he said that he voted for Mr. Nixon in 1972. He also said he had voted for Ronald Reagan in 1980 and 1984."
...

...

...

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:35 AM
(0) comments


w


Clark 'Probably' Would Have Backed War (washingtonpost.com):
"Retired Gen. Wesley K. Clark said today that he 'probably' would have voted for the congressional resolution last fall authorizing war, as he charged out into the presidential campaign field with vague plans to fix the economy and the situation in Iraq.

Clark said his views on the war resemble those of Democratic Sens. Joseph I. Lieberman (Conn.) and John F. Kerry (Mass.), both of whom voted for the war but now question President Bush's stewardship of the Iraqi occupation. 'That having been said, I was against the war as it emerged because there was no reason to start it when we did. We could have waited,' Clark said during a 75-minute session with four reporters."
So, how do his views differ from Kerry, again? Other than Kerry has experience in Washington?

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:40 AM
(0) comments


w


All you get today is a Guardian profile of Krugman, as he is on vacation from the times: Profile: Paul Krugman
Still, there's an important sense in which his views remain essentially moderate: unlike the growing numbers of America-bashers in Europe, Krugman doesn't make the nebulous argument that there is something inherently objectionable about the US and its role in the world. He claims only that a fundamentally benign system has been taken over by a bunch of extremists - and so his alarming analysis leaves room for optimism, because they can be removed. "One of the Democratic candidates - who I'm not endorsing, because I'm not allowed to endorse - has as his slogan, 'I want my country back'," Krugman says, referring to the campaigning motto of Howard Dean. "I think that's about right."

Or, to quote a state department official who put it pungently to a reporter earlier this year, describing the dominance of the Pentagon hawks: "I just wake up in the morning and tell myself, 'There's been a military coup'. And then it all makes sense."
But if he could endorse someone...

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:34 AM
(0) comments


wThursday, September 18, 2003


Why can't I find any good info about Helen Keller's later years? All I can find is stuff about her childhood and breif mentions about "She was also a socialist." Nothing about her working for suffrage, nothing about what she did as a socalist, nothing about her working for the unions. Is my only source that I'm going to be able to use for my speech "Lies My Teacher Told Me"?

Do any of you have any sources I can use?

posted by Anonymous at 6:18 PM
(0) comments


w


Quote Of The Day
"As for the political leaders themselves, President Bush and Tony Blair should be proud of their resolve in the face of so much doubt. And especially Mr Blair, who skillfully managed tough internal politics, an incredibly powerful and sometimes almost irrationally resolute ally, and concerns within Europe. Their opponents, those who questioned the necessity or wisdom of the operation, are temporarily silent, but probably unconvinced. And more tough questions remain to be answered. "

- Gen. Wesley Clark (ret.), April 10, 2003


Source

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:42 PM
(0) comments


w


Mistakes of Vietnam repeated with Iraq:
"Unfortunately, the people who drove the engine to get into the war in Iraq never served in Vietnam. Not the president. Not the vice president. Not the secretary of defense. Not the deputy secretary of defense. Too bad. They could have learned some lessons"
If you only read one thing about the war we now face in Iraq - read this.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:27 PM
(0) comments


w


Buy me this

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:13 AM
(0) comments


wWednesday, September 17, 2003


Make up your fucking mind.

::twitch::

posted by Anonymous at 6:24 PM
(0) comments


w


Clark's official campaign website: America For Clark. Remind you of anyone else's?

And I may as well point this out: Wesley Clark: The New Anti-War Candidate?
The possibility that former NATO supreme commander Wesley Clark might enter the race for the 2004 Democratic presidential nomination has been the subject of furious speculation in the media. But while recent coverage of Clark often claims that he opposed the war with Iraq, the various opinions he has expressed on the issue suggest the media's "anti-war" label is inaccurate.


posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:13 AM
(0) comments


wTuesday, September 16, 2003


Edwards announced, Feinstein endorsed Kerry, and Clark's said he's in. Fun.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:31 PM
(0) comments


w


U.S. Forces Detain Westerners in Iraq:
ABU GHRAIB, Iraq - Six people claiming to be Americans and two who say they are British are in U.S. custody on suspicion of involvement in attacks on coalition forces, an American general said Tuesday. They would be the first Westerners reported held in the insurrection against the U.S.-led occupation.

Brig. Gen. Janis Karpinski, who is in charge of coalition detention centers in Iraq, said the alleged Americans and Britons were considered security detainees, meaning they were suspected of involvement in guerrilla attacks. She did not identify the purported Westerners but said they were being interrogated by military intelligence.
U.S. Constitution:
Clause 1: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

Clause 2: The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.


Two things...

One: if Americans are travelling to Iraq to attack their countrymen... well, you hold POWs but you shoot traitors.

Two: Treason is the only crime detailed in the constitution, and there is little doubt to the meaning of the above clause. Why do I think the administration won't bother to follow it?

(Corruption of Blood and Forfeiture refer to inheritance and property, and don't apply here, in case you were curious.)

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:29 PM
(0) comments


w


New Post to the White Book on Ian McKellen's site.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:44 AM
(0) comments


w


More Rumblings... http://www.129bringthemhome.com/

Where's Clear Channel with those "Support Our Troops" rallies now?

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:27 AM
(0) comments


w


Things that make you go hmm...

Soccer teams go on a revolutionary kick - Communists play anarchists in Berkeley

Sometimes California sounds fun. Sometimes it sounds scary. I'm not sure which this is.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:01 AM
(0) comments


w


CalPundit: An Interview With Paul Krugman

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 8:56 AM
(0) comments


wMonday, September 15, 2003


Some GOP Bumper Sticker ideas for 2004(e-mailed to me):

Bush/Cheney '04: Four More Wars!
Bush/Cheney '04: Assimilate. Resistance is Futile
Bush/Cheney '04: Apocalypse Now!
Bush/Cheney '04: Because the truth just isn't good enough
Bush/Cheney '04: Compassionate Colonialism
Bush/Cheney '04: Deja-voodoo all over again!
Bush/Cheney '04: Get used to it!
Bush/Cheney '04: Leave no billionaire behind
Bush/Cheney '04: Lies and videotape but no sex!
Bush/Cheney '04: Or else.
Bush/Cheney '04: Over a billion Whoppers served.
Bush/Cheney '04: Putting the "con" in conservatism
Bush/Cheney '04: Thanks for not paying attention
Bush/Cheney '04: The economy's stupid!
Bush/Cheney '04: The last vote you'll ever have to cast.
Bush/Cheney '04: This time, elect us!
Bush/Cheney '04: We're Gooder!
Bush/Cheney: Asses of Evil
Don't think. Vote Bush!
George W. Bush: A brainwave away from the presidency
George W. Bush: It takes a village idiot
George W. Bush: The buck stops Over There
God Save the King!
Let them eat yellowcake! Vote Bush!
Peace & Prosperity Suck -- Big-Time
Vote Bush in '04: "I Has Incumbentory Advantitude"
Vote Bush in '04: "Because every vote counts -- for me!"
Vote Bush in '04: "Because I'm the President, that's why!"
Vote Bush in '04: Because dictatorship is easier
Vote for Bush & You Get Dick!
Who would Jesus Bomb?

posted by Anonymous at 4:55 PM
(0) comments


w


Where's Waldo?

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 3:17 PM
(0) comments


w


Kerry Communications Director Resigns

Hmm.
John Kerry's communications director has resigned over differences in the direction of the Democrat's presidential campaign.

Chris Lehane's departure comes amid speculation of a wider shake-up in the Kerry campaign, which has been torn by internal fights and a lack of public support from the candidate.
I can't stand Chris Lehane, and I think Kerry's better off without him. But I'm real curious as to what's happenning in Kerry-land...

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:09 PM
(0) comments


w


Canadians are funny
The increasingly bitter tone of the Ontario campaign took a surreal turn Friday when a press release from the Tory election machine labelled Liberal Leader Dalton McGuinty a pet-eating alien.
(stolen from Calpundit)

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:08 AM
(0) comments


w


Bonus Sunday Krugman: The Tax-Cut Con

In other news, I shook Howard Dean's hand this weekend and you didn't.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:25 AM
(0) comments


wFriday, September 12, 2003




(stolen from uggabugga)

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 1:36 PM
(0) comments


w


Hey, cute: Dick Gephardt for President - George W. Bush: A Miserable Failure

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:07 AM
(0) comments


w


Guess who? Exploiting the Atrocity

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:14 AM
(0) comments


wThursday, September 11, 2003


What the crap?

Missouri lawmakers overrode Gov. Bob Holden's vetos of a bill mandating a 24-hour waiting period for women seeking abortions, and have legalized concealed guns.


Not that I'm making an opinion either way about the issues, but man is that a wierd way to write a headline.

posted by Anonymous at 7:43 PM
(0) comments


w


Ooooooh, pleasuregasm! I'm not even going to bother talking about it, I'll just post what I got here!

Sept. 10, 2003

Working families win! President Bush's overtime pay
cuts suffered a major setback today when the U.S. Senate
voted to block the overtime pay takeaway. We won this
first step because the Senate Democrats and a handful
of Republicans stood up to President Bush. They acted
because they heard your voice. Your activism made a
big difference--people like you sent hundreds of thousands
of letters, faxes and e-mails and made tens of thousands
of phone calls over the past few months. This victory
is ONLY ONE STEP forward. More action is needed now.
You can act now or keep reading to learn more.
http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/houseotvote/xgbk83z05xd7

Now, the fight to block President Bush's overtime pay
cuts turns to the U.S. House of Representatives. Representatives
will be asked to vote on a similar measure--preventing
the Bush administration from taking away workers' hard-earned
overtime pay protections. Please take one minute right
now to send a fax to your representative, Representative
Jerry Costello, from
the AFL-CIO website.
http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/houseotvote/xgbk83z05xd7

After you send your fax please click on the link below
to spread the word to your friends, family and co-workers.
http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/houseotvote/forward/xgbk83z05xd7

Also, these links may be of interest.

Overtime Pay News from the AFL-CIO
http://www.unionvoice.org/ct/q7a6cR4147a6/

U.S. Senate Vote Tally by State from Sept. 10
http://www.unionvoice.org/ct/qpa6cR4147aO/

Thanks for all you do.


posted by Anonymous at 1:30 PM
(0) comments


w


Happy Patriot Day

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:20 AM
(0) comments


wWednesday, September 10, 2003


Click This Ad (requires Flash)

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 5:17 PM
(0) comments


w


Quote Of The Day
"Dean, Dean, Dean, Dean, Dean..." - John Kerry
Source

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:06 AM
(0) comments


wTuesday, September 09, 2003


And my hope in human goodness falls another 20 points. I don't see how anyone could think humans are born generally good.

posted by Anonymous at 6:42 PM
(0) comments


w




posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 12:08 PM
(0) comments


w


Krugman... he's just so... mean... Other People's Sacrifice

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:52 AM
(0) comments


w


Rivals Criticize Dean For Mideast Comment (washingtonpost.com):
"Howard Dean came under fire yesterday from two rivals for the Democratic nomination for saying the United States should not 'take sides' in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. "
This is big. This is a shift from the historical position of the Democratic party and the country as a whole. It's also the correct moral position.

And in case nobody else noticed, Muslims now outnumber Jews in America.

We're fast approaching the day when the cries of the children of Palestine will matter to Uncle Sam as much as the cries of the children of Israel.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:46 AM
(0) comments


wMonday, September 08, 2003


I haven't seen this on the blog, which angers me, because you're too caught up in picking apart rich people to pay attention to the working class. Get off your ass, go to this link, and contact your senators. That is, unless you want to work like a fucking slave.

That fucking asshole.

If you posted something about this before, I haven't seen it. Apologies if you have.

posted by Anonymous at 7:43 PM
(0) comments


w


Star-News Online:
"Anti-globalization protesters stripped out of their clothes and spelled out the words 'No WTO' with their naked bodies Monday, the first of several actions against the World Trade Organization meeting in this Caribbean resort."
Let's face it: The World needs more Nude Protests.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 3:15 PM
(0) comments


wFriday, September 05, 2003


Hip Clock (requires Flash)

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:39 AM
(0) comments


w


Actor Johnny Depp Disavows Anti-American Quotes
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Denying any anti-American sentiment on his part, actor Johnny Depp (news) said on Thursday that quotes attributed to him as likening the United States to a "dumb puppy" were inaccurate and taken out of context.

"I am an American. I love my country and have great hopes for it," Depp said in a statement released by his Los Angeles-based publicist. "It is for this reason that I speak candidly and sometimes critically about it. I have benefited greatly from the freedom that exists in my country and for this I am eternally grateful."

Depp, currently starring in the swashbuckling film "Pirates of the Caribbean," issued the statement a day after the German news magazine Stern published an interview in which he ridiculed Washington's confrontation with France, where he lives, over the U.S. war in Iraq (news - web sites).

The magazine quoted the actor as saying "America is ... like a dumb puppy that has big teeth that can bite and hurt you, aggressive." He was further quoted as saying he wanted his children to "see America as ... a broken toy" that they should explore, get the feel of, then "get out."

Explaining his comments a day later, Depp he had been using a metaphor that was taken "radically out of context," adding, "There was no anti-American sentiment."

"What I was saying was that, compared to Europe, America is a very young country and we are still growing as a nation," he said. "My deepest apologies to those who were offended, affected, or hurt by this insanely twisted deformation of my words and intent."

His spokeswoman added that the Kentucky-born Depp, 40, lives in the south of France with his family because his wife, actress-singer Vanessa Paradis (news), is French.
In other news, William Shatner has recorded some radio comercials for Kellog's. I can't wait!

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:29 AM
(0) comments


w


Google Search: answer to life, the universe, and everything

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:05 AM
(0) comments


w


Friday Krugman: The China Syndrome

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 8:59 AM
(0) comments


wThursday, September 04, 2003


Bumpersticker Watch: If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will shoot their kids accidentally.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:10 AM
(0) comments


w


Edwards has a blog now. Good for him.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:39 AM
(0) comments


wWednesday, September 03, 2003


John Kerry makes it official.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:18 PM
(0) comments


w


Deanlink me, baby.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 1:46 PM
(0) comments


w


Clinton Revisted over at Body and Soul.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:58 AM
(0) comments


w


Moore alters "Bowling" DVD in response to criticism

Here you go Andy. It's a present from me to you.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:24 AM
(0) comments


w


Johnny Depp Says U.S. Is Like a Stupid Puppy :
"BERLIN (Reuters) - Hollywood star Johnny Depp said on Wednesday the United States was a stupid, aggressive puppy and he would not live there until the political climate changed.

The 40-year-old actor, who stars in the 'Pirates of the Caribbean,' told the German news magazine Stern he was happier staying in the south of France with his wife, the French actress and singer Vanessa Paradis, and their two children.

'America is dumb, it's like a dumb puppy that has big teeth that can bite and hurt you, aggressive,' he said.

'My daughter is four, my boy is one. I'd like them to see America as a toy, a broken toy. Investigate it a little, check it out, get this feeling and then get out,' said the star of the off-beat films 'Edward Scissorhands' and 'Dead Man.'

Depp slammed George W. Bush's administration for its criticism of French opposition to the U.S.-led war in Iraq.

'I was ecstatic they re-named 'French Fries' as 'Freedom Fries'. Grown men and women in positions of power in the U.S. government showing themselves as idiots,' he told Stern."


posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 8:54 AM
(0) comments


w


Why Dean and Franken are so hot right now:
"And what is the temper of the Democratic Party base? They loathe Bush and everything he stands for -- he's become a lightning rod for dark and febrile passions in the same way Bill Clinton was (and is) for the GOP core. It's not just his harebrained ideological nostrums for how to reorder America and the world. They hate him and it's personal. They hate his frat-boy smirk, his phony fly-boy act, his cringe-inducing mangling of the language, his born-again sanctimony, even his Texas twang and his godforsaken, tumbleweed ranch where only someone as fence-post-dumb as W. would hole up in August. They hate him like their lives depended on it, lives that will certainly be unbearable if this bumbling extremist is reelected (or elected) in 2004. "
Every once in a while I remember why I subscribe to Salon. Go get a daypass.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 8:51 AM
(0) comments


wTuesday, September 02, 2003


So George, how do you feel about your mom and dad?

The Guardian got a shrink to analyze Bush from afar. I wouldn't put too much stock in it, but it is delightfully full of snark and bitchiness.*

*Disclaimer: as I've often stated, I'm not sure if I believe in Psychology.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:29 AM
(0) comments


w


I read Al Franken's new book last week, so I've got a copy for the first person who asks to borrow it. Here's an excerpt (c/o Atrios):
"[M]ainly it was Coleman’s proxies who played it dirty," Al Franken writes. "The National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) ran an ad called ‘Pork’ that hit the hypocrisy jackpot. It savaged Wellstone for voting ‘to spend thousands of dollars to control seaweed in Maui,’ claiming that he prioritized seaweed control over national defense. In fact, Wellstone did vote for S.1216, as did Strom Thurmond, Trent Lott and 84 other senators. That bill did appropriate the seaweed control spending—but it also provided $21 billion for veterans’ health care, $27 billion for veterans’ compensation and pensions, and block grants to assist New York City’s recovery from 9/11. The NRSC was chaired that year by Bill Frist, who later replaced Lott as Senate majority leader. Before the memorial, Frist spoke with the Wellstones’ older son, David, who later recounted the conversation to me.

"‘I’m sorry about your parents and your sister,’ Frist told David.

"‘Did you authorize the seaweed ad against my dad?’ David asked.

"‘Yes,’ said Frist.

"‘And did you vote for the seaweed bill?’

"There was a pause. They both knew that the answer was yes. Finally, Frist said, ‘It wasn’t personal.’

"‘My dad took it personal,’ David said. ‘Thanks for coming to my family’s memorial.’"
The book is honest, funny, and brutal to the right.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:14 AM
(0) comments


w


BIPARTISANSHIP
I'll kiss your elephant
when you kiss my ass

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:02 AM
(0) comments


w


Special Monday Morning Krugman: Another Friday Outrage

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 8:48 AM
(0) comments


wFriday, August 29, 2003


Wow, a Presidential Candidate Blog post worth linking to. And on Bob Graham's blog, no less. So go read.

Just for the record: I am a Dean supporter, y'all know that. But I also like Kerry, Graham, Kucinich, Edwards, Sharpton, Gephardt, and even Lieberman. Anybody but Bush, right?

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 4:17 PM
(3) comments


w


Some Liberals have said some very stupid things recently. Not as stupid as Conservatives, but still stupid.

In case anyone's curious, I'm definately on the "We broke it, we bought it" side with Iraq. And I think the best way to fix the country is to establish a UN mandate and put the whole country under UN authority.

Saying "US out of Iraq!" is about as dumb as thinking we can finish this job alone...

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 3:50 PM
(0) comments


w


Cowboy Krugman: Fistfuls of Dollars

Yee Haw!

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:22 AM
(0) comments


w


Do Jobs Not Matter Anymore? (washingtonpost.com)
The lesson of the Depression was that if ordinary workers lacked jobs and adequate incomes, the economy would crash because too few people could afford to buy what businesses hoped to sell. This was demand-side economics and it laid heavy stress on spreading incomes and job opportunities broadly.

The supply-siders insisted that supply created its own demand. In plain English, this meant we should think less about labor and more about capital -- specifically, investors who created the means to produce the goods. If the New Dealers glorified the role of the worker, the supply-siders glorified the entrepreneur.
Make no mistake - the supply-siders are filfthy lying ratfuckers. Who the hell cares if the GDP goes up if we're still losing jobs?

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 8:48 AM
(0) comments


wThursday, August 28, 2003


I wrote a pretty long piece in my journal with my thoughts on Arnold.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 12:45 PM
(0) comments


wWednesday, August 27, 2003


Ho-lee shiiiiit. Wierd. Creepy.

posted by Anonymous at 5:30 PM
(0) comments


w


This is the coolest thing I've seen in a week: http://www.nationmaster.com/

You can compare countries on almost any statistic you want!

And after a few minutes of doing this - I have discovered that in many ways, the US does indeed suck.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:46 AM
(0) comments


w


In Wal-Mart's America (washingtonpost.com)
Just as Ford, GM and the UAW once drove up wages for workers who were nowhere near auto factories, so Wal-Mart drives down wages for workers who never set foot there. Controlling as it does so much of the low-end retail market, Wal-Mart has, with great success, pressured suppliers to cut their labor costs. No other American company has done as much to destroy what's left of the U.S. clothing and textile industry or been so loyal a friend to the dankest sweatshops of the developing world. And unless American unions can find the political leverage to block Wal-Mart's expansion into non-southern metropolitan areas, the company poses a huge threat to the million or so unionized clerks who work at the nation's major supermarket chains.
Walmart is eeeeeeeeeeeeevil.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:28 AM
(0) comments


wTuesday, August 26, 2003


Matt, if you don't know about this, get off your butt. Everyone else, go read.

Btw, the link command is < a href= > and < /a > NOT [ url ] [ /url ]. The url command is only supported by certain chat boards, href is universal.

And always remember to close off your commands with the < / x >! Weston is really bad about that!

posted by Anonymous at 7:43 PM
(0) comments


w


Krugman: Dust and Deception

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:42 AM
(0) comments


wMonday, August 25, 2003


GET YOUR WAR ON

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 3:49 PM
(0) comments


w


I tried to post a commment, so it said something was down so that function wasn't avalible. Let me post it here instead....

On your Salon article, I do not have a subscription. But so what if they wrote it too? I'm trying to get to the point that before I had read that other report I was taken hook-line-and-sinker in that movie. I know he's biased, but that was almost 2 hours of lies. If I had know before hand I wouldn't be so offended, but it was pure deciet(Spelling?)

On the response Moore had he just attacked Salon and he best response he could come up with was to ask that they stop attacking him. I didn't see him really trying to defend his works.



posted by Anonymous at 1:37 PM
(0) comments


wSunday, August 24, 2003


Never have I felt so deeply betrayed or lied to.

Everyone must read [URL=http://www.hardylaw.net/truth_about_bowling.html]this[/URL] if you have seen "Bowling for Columbine".

posted by Anonymous at 8:30 PM
(0) comments


wFriday, August 22, 2003


Behind the Failure (washingtonpost.com)
What's required? It's obvious we need more troops in Iraq. Since the administration played down the cost of the occupation before hostilities started, that may be hard to sell to the American people now. As we don't want to bear the whole burden of this enterprise ourselves, we desperately need much more help from allies. We'll soon learn how much crow the administration is willing to eat to make that happen.

And we need to spend a lot more money to put Iraqis to work, to fix Iraq's oil facilities and to repair its electric power system. Will the administration and its neoconservative allies ever admit that their big government policies abroad are inconsistent with their tax cuts for the rich at home?

Now that we have invaded Iraq, we cannot afford to let the place go to pieces. The administration can hold fast to its arrogance. Or it can acknowledge its mistakes and chart a new course.
Well, sure. Right, this would be the emerging center-left consensus (where I usually find myself in foreign affairs, being all Wilsonian and stuff). So the question remains - how stupid can this administration be?

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 12:05 PM
(0) comments


w


Krugman... with attitude! Conan the Deceiver

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:32 AM
(0) comments


wThursday, August 21, 2003


Update: Pandas still cute.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 8:12 PM
(0) comments


w


Quote Of The Day
"I enjoy watching FOX NEWS and I think every country should have their own Al-Jazeera."
- Jon Stewart


posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 4:39 PM
(0) comments


w


A Fair and Balanced Lawsuit

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:50 AM
(0) comments


wTuesday, August 19, 2003


What do you do if you're 57 and an ex-president? I'm not sure, but today is the Big Dog's birthday.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:12 PM
(0) comments


w


Krugman on Energy: The Road to Ruin

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:22 AM
(0) comments


w


UN building in Baghdad Bombed.

I really have no idea how we get out of this mess. I've been saying for a while that we need to stick it out, get a UN mandate, international cooperation, blah, blah, blah - but I'm wondering if that's even possible (and if possible, even effective) at this stage of the game.

Let's face it: we don't even know who's responsible for these attacks, or how to stop them. And every time we crack down on the rebel scum, the more stormtroopers we lose.

I'm not ready yet (as some have suggested) to give up on Iraq. I do think there is a chance that these are just Ba'athist thugs, but I'm starting to doubt it.

Of course, Vietnam looked pretty winnable in 1966.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:18 AM
(0) comments


wMonday, August 18, 2003


Shatner News
In fact, William Shatner calls the "Star Trek" outlook "somewhat dire."

When asked if he felt the film series was finished, Shatner replied, "I would say so, yes -- at least for the present.

"I think that Patrick (Stewart) doesn't want to do it anymore," he said. "The other cast of 'Star Trek' . . . they have run their race and have made many films -- good ones, I think -- so there's another phase, but we don't know what it is."

But all is not lost for devoted followers of the Federation.

The series still has its hardcore fan base, especially those at conventions. Trekkers are notoriously loyal to the series and to most anyone associated with the series, Shatner said.

"I find that the conventions are like a built-in audience and I treat them like stand-up comedy and work on new material," he said. "It's great fun and you can't fail because they love you."

And while he wouldn't discuss specifics, Shatner said he has an idea for a new "Star Trek" series.

"In fact, I'm trying to interest the powers -- and that has many levels to it -- for me to conceive another 'Star Trek' manifestation," he said. "It would be a concept for a series."


posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 12:01 PM
(0) comments


w


Salon.com | Big lies:
"If your workplace is safe; if your children go to school rather than being forced into labor; if you are paid a living wage, including overtime; if you enjoy a 40-hour week and you are allowed to join a union to protect your rights -- you can thank liberals. If your food is not poisoned and your water is drinkable -- you can thank liberals. If your parents are eligible for Medicare and Social Security, so they can grow old in dignity without bankrupting your family -- you can thank liberals. If our rivers are getting cleaner and our air isn't black with pollution; if our wilderness is protected and our countryside is still green -- you can thank liberals. If people of all races can share the same public facilities; if everyone has the right to vote; if couples fall in love and marry regardless of race; if we have finally begun to transcend a segregated society -- you can thank liberals. Progressive innovations like those and so many others were achieved by long, difficult struggles against entrenched power. What defined conservatism, and conservatives, was their opposition to every one of those advances. The country we know and love today was built by those victories for liberalism -- with the support of the American people. "
Get a daypass, this one's worth it.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:52 AM
(0) comments


wFriday, August 15, 2003


Howard Dean Holding Phone Fundraiser on Gephardt's Home Turf
" One of the leading Democratic candidates for President is making a foray into the heart of Gephardt Country.

Local supporters of the Howard Dean campaign will be at the Bevo Mill tonight for a phone-conference fundraiser with the former Vermont Governor on the line.

Is this a big deal?

'He's coming into Gephardt's turf, not physically, but by phone,' says St. Louis University Political Science Professor Ken Warren. 'That's somewhat embarassing for Gephardt.'

Warren says Gephardt is not doing as well as expected by now, and the political fact of life is he's lagging at number three in the Democratic pack behind Dean and Massachusetts Senator John Kerry.
'Dean doesn't have any chance of winning Missouri,' Warren says. 'But still, he will be able to raise some money here.'"


posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:07 AM
(0) comments


w


Friday Krugman: Twilight Zone Economics

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:20 AM
(0) comments


w


Rock Star





posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:00 AM
(0) comments


w


Lou lost power yesterday, the dangers of living in Cleveland, I suppose.

"Well, it's been great talking to you, I think I'm going to go inside our air-conditioned house, maybe get a cold drink out of the fridge, microwave something, and watch a DVD."

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:54 AM
(0) comments


wThursday, August 14, 2003


Where is Raed ?

If you haven't been to check in on Salam for a while, you should. He's completely sold out.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:31 PM
(0) comments


wWednesday, August 13, 2003


KSDK views are smart today. They realize that another rate cut probably won't help the economy.

posted by Anonymous at 6:56 PM
(0) comments


w


Open Range comes out this weekend. Kevin Costner + Horses = Quality.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:19 AM
(0) comments


w


If you're intersted in the financing of the Bush CREEP effort, you might want to check out: http://www.whitehouseforsale.org/

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:36 AM
(0) comments


w


Want to have some fun during the Republican Convention next year?

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 9:50 AM
(0) comments


wTuesday, August 12, 2003


Quote Of The Day
As people do better, they start voting like Republicans -- unless they have too much education and vote Democratic, which proves there can be too much of a good thing.
-- Karl Rove, W.'s chief political strategist


posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:58 PM
(0) comments


w


More Dead Soldiers...
Spc. Kristopher Haney, who serves with West in Germany, told The Seattle Times the family was informed that Longstreth died of a gunshot wound to the head. Investigators believe it was an accident and that no other soldiers were involved, Haney added.
Nice euphemisms there. But back here on earth we call a "non-combat related firearm head wound" a suicide.



posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 1:48 PM
(0) comments


w


CONVENTION ON PROHIBITIONS OR RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF CERTAIN CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS WHICH MAY BE DEEMED TO BE EXCESSIVELY INJURIOUS OR TO HAVE INDISCRIMINATE EFFECTS AND PROTOCOLS (1980)
PROTOCOL ON PROHIBITIONS OR RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF INCENDIARY WEAPONS (PROTOCOL III)

Article 1

Definitions

For the purpose of this Protocol:

1. "Incendiary weapon" means any weapon or munition which is primarily
designed to set fire to objects or to cause burn injury to persons
through the action of flame, heat, or a combination thereof, produced by
a chemical reaction of a substance delivered on the target.
(a) Incendiary weapons can take the form of, for example, flame
throwers, fougasses, shells, rockets, grenades, mines, bombs and other
containers of incendiary substances.

(b) Incendiary weapons do not include:
(i) Munitions which may have incidental incendiary effects, such
as illuminants, tracers, smoke or signalling systems;

(ii) Munitions designed to combine penetration, blast or
fragmentation effects with an additional incendiary effect,
such as armour-piercing projectiles, fragmentation shells,
explosive bombs and similar combined-effects munitions in
which the incendiary effect is not specifically designed to
cause burn injury to persons, but to be used against military
objectives, such as armoured vehicles, aircraft and
installations or facilities.
2. "Concentration of civilians" means any concentration of civilians, be
it permanent or temporary, such as in inhabited parts of cities, or
inhabited towns or villages, or as in camps or columns of refugees or
evacuees, or groups of nomads.

3. "Military objective" means, so far as objects are concerned, any
object which by its nature, location, purpose or use makes an effective
contribution to military action and whose total or partial destruction
capture or neutralization, in the circumstances ruling at the time,
offers a definite military advantage.

4. "Civilian objects" are all objects which are not military objectives
as defined in paragraph 3.

5. "Feasible precautions" are those precautions which are practicable or
practically possible taking into account all circumstances ruling at the
time, including humanitarian and military considerations.

Article 2

Protection of civilians and civilian objects

1.It is prohibited in all circumstances to make the civilian population
as such, individual civilians or civilian objects the object of attack by
incendiary weapons.

2. It is prohibited in all circumstances to make any military objective
located within a concentration of civilians the object of attack by
air-delivered incendiary weapons.

3. It is further prohibited to make any military objective located within
a concentration of civilians the object of attack by means of incendiary
weapons other than air-delivered incendiary weapons, except when such
military objective is clearly separated from the concentration of
civilians and all feasible precautions are taken with a view to limiting
the incendiary effects to the military objective and to avoiding, and in
any event to minimizing, incidental loss of civilian life, injury to
civilians and damage to civilian objects.

4. It is prohibited to make forests or other kinds of plant cover the
object of attack by incendiary weapons except when such natural elements
are used to cover, conceal or camouflage combatants or other military
objectives, or are themselves military objectives.



posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 12:10 PM
(0) comments


w


You know, I never signed an agreement saying I wouldn't go out into the street and start throwing grenades at Republicans. It must be all right then.

The Pentagon has admitted it, soldiers have testified to it, newspapers from London to Sydney have reported it - and I still get 0 hits when I search the New York Times and the Washington Post for our use of Napalm during the war. That crazy liberal media.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:42 AM
(0) comments


w


Explaining George Bush

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:52 AM
(0) comments


w


Krugman Time: Thanks for the M.R.E.'s



posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:47 AM
(0) comments


wMonday, August 11, 2003


US Used Napalm in Iraq
American pilots dropped the controversial incendiary agent napalm on Iraqi troops during the advance on Baghdad. The attacks caused massive fireballs that obliterated several Iraqi positions.

The Pentagon denied using napalm at the time, but Marine pilots and their commanders have confirmed that they used an upgraded version of the weapon against dug-in positions. They said napalm, which has a distinctive smell, was used because of its psychological effect on an enemy.

A 1980 UN convention banned the use against civilian targets of napalm, a terrifying mixture of jet fuel and polystyrene that sticks to skin as it burns. The US, which did not sign the treaty, is one of the few countries that makes use of the weapon. It was employed notoriously against both civilian and military targets in the Vietnam war.

The upgraded weapon, which uses kerosene rather than petrol, was used in March and April, when dozens of napalm bombs were dropped near bridges over the Saddam Canal and the Tigris river, south of Baghdad.

"We napalmed both those [bridge] approaches," said Colonel James Alles, commander of Marine Air Group 11. "Unfortunately there were people there ... you could see them in the [cockpit] video. They were Iraqi soldiers. It's no great way to die. The generals love napalm. It has a big psychological effect."
I'm confident that Napalm was only used against legitimate Military Targets. My government would never lie to me about that.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 1:29 PM
(0) comments


w


Thompson Interview

Recent - Exclusive - Gonzo

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 12:36 PM
(0) comments


w


Hey, Kerry got a blog.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:26 AM
(0) comments


wFriday, August 08, 2003


Buy Me This

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 1:01 PM
(0) comments


w


Did you know Thomas Jefferson was the first President to reject the British Custom of wearing a powdered wig?

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 12:50 PM
(0) comments


w


I don't agree, but I'll post anyway.

http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/

(via Kos)

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 12:45 PM
(0) comments


w


Friday I'm in Krugman: Salt Of The Earth

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:04 AM
(0) comments


w


Hmmm
A former Intel software engineer admitted Wednesday that he and five other men were prepared to take up arms and die as martyrs if necessary to defend the former Taliban government in Afghanistan.

Maher "Mike" Hawash's surprise plea deal with federal prosecutors requires him to testify against his alleged co-conspirators in exchange for a seven- to 10-year prison sentence. Experts say Hawash's cooperation strengthens the government's case against the remaining six defendants.

Noticeably absent from Wednesday's hearing were the throngs of friends and supporters who publicly protested on Hawash's behalf at previous hearings.

Hawash pleaded guilty to one count: conspiring to contribute services to the Taliban. The charge relates to his participation in an October 2001 trip in which he and five other men flew from Portland to China in an unsuccessful attempt to reach the Afghan battlefield. A seventh defendant never left the country.
There's got to be more to this story...

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:29 AM
(0) comments


wThursday, August 07, 2003


Ahh, yes, that makes sense now.

Josh is way smarter than me.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:53 PM
(0) comments


w


Gore Speech
If the 21st century is to be well started, we need a national agenda that is worked out in concert with the people, a healing agenda that is built on a true national consensus. Millions of Americans got the impression that George W. Bush wanted to be a "healer, not a divider", a president devoted first and foremost to "honor and integrity." Yet far from uniting the people, the president's ideologically narrow agenda has seriously divided America. His most partisan supporters have launched a kind of 'civil cold war' against those with whom they disagree.

And as for honor and integrity, let me say this: we know what that was all about, but hear me well, not as a candidate for any office, but as an American citizen who loves my country:

For eight years, the Clinton-Gore Administration gave this nation honest budget numbers; an economic plan with integrity that rescued the nation from debt and stagnation; honest advocacy for the environment; real compassion for the poor; a strengthening of our military -- as recently proven -- and a foreign policy whose purposes were elevated, candidly presented and courageously pursued, in the face of scorched-earth tactics by the opposition. That is also a form of honor and integrity, and not every administration in recent memory has displayed it.

So I would say to those who have found the issue of honor and integrity so useful as a political tool, that the people are also looking for these virtues in the execution of public policy on their behalf, and will judge whether they are present or absent.
Pretty much what I expected, it's a nice speech. Hopefully the wingnuts who keep claiming Gore or Hillary is going to jump back into the race will calm down now.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:57 AM
(0) comments


wWednesday, August 06, 2003


Hmmm, Bush's re-elect number is at 36. That's really, really good for us. The rest of the poll doesn't matter so much, since most people don't even know who the Democrats are right now.

Pandas are still cute, by the way.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 3:36 PM
(0) comments


w


Dean Meetup Tonight. Don't forget now.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:19 PM
(0) comments


w


Three weeks after I buy Casablanca, they come out with a special edition. Grr.

So, who wants a regular Casablanca DVD from me?

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:40 AM
(0) comments


wTuesday, August 05, 2003


"Yes, I support gay marriages. I have this uncle Tom who's like, 'The thought of two men having sex makes me sick.' But I say, 'The thought of you and aunt Sally humping away makes me sick.'"

posted by Anonymous at 7:44 PM
(0) comments


w


Pandas are just so cute.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 1:58 PM
(0) comments


w


Cato Institute Bites Bush

Sometimes conservatives do have principles. It's important to note that not all conservatives are Fascist goons.

Print that article out and give it to anyone who ever talks about "big-spending" Democrats ever again.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 12:49 PM
(0) comments


w


Krugman for Tooseday - Everything Is Political

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:54 AM
(0) comments


w


Day of Prayer with Larry Flynt

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:50 AM
(0) comments


wMonday, August 04, 2003


Quote Of The Day
"We need to recognize a government that would deny a gay man a bridal registry is a fascist one."
- Margaret Cho


posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:32 PM
(0) comments


w




posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:01 PM
(0) comments


w


For those of you who've never followed Presidential Campaigns before, you might be interested in reviewing the history at http://www.4president.org/.

I think Dean should be able to beat the "McGovern" meme pretty soon. Look out for "Tsongas" next!

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 1:38 PM
(0) comments


w


One more reason Bush can't have two terms - Powell's leaving after one, and Wolfowitz wants the job.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:54 AM
(0) comments


w


MemeWatch

Elect Bush 2004:
Cocaine, Champagne, Petroleum

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:06 AM
(0) comments


wFriday, August 01, 2003


I was talking last night with Tim about just how bizzare and surreal the California recall is. I went on at some length that it ws the strangest election I'd ever seen. And it just keeps getting weirder...

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:33 PM
(0) comments


w


TOMPAINE.com - Stretching The Truth
Despite all the new laws, rules, lawsuits and headlines over the last year, earnings reports continue to overstate corporate income.
Boring topic, but when Bob Reich writes, I read.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 1:35 PM
(0) comments


w


TOMPAINE.com - Stretching The Truth
Despite all the new laws, rules, lawsuits and headlines over the last year, earnings reports continue to overstate corporate income.
Boring topic, but when Bob Reich writes, I read.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 1:35 PM
(0) comments


w


Shatner Update
Kellogg Canada next week will launch the All-Bran Two-Week Challenge, a national marketing effort featuring actor William Shatner.

The campaign is intended to encourage Canadians to take charge of their health by increasing their daily fiber intake with just a half cup per day of All-Bran Original.
I think I might make William Fucking Shatner a daily item.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 1:17 PM
(0) comments


w


Friday Krugman: State of Decline

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:55 AM
(0) comments


wThursday, July 31, 2003


LOWEST BID WINS, YOU STUPID $&%*#$%! My GOD, I can't read these articles without getting headaches. Do they even KNOW the principles of economics?! If you want the contract, bid lower than your competitors. Is that so hard to understand?!

posted by Anonymous at 6:28 PM
(0) comments


w


Indulge me in my Shatner & Nimoy obsession:
LEONARD Nimoy, who ruffled religious feathers last year when he published a nude photography book, "Shekhina," based on his study of the Jewish mysticism Kaballah, is taking his act to the stage. Elisa Monte, a former principal dancer with the Martha Graham dance company, is choreographing a piece based on Nimoy's photos that bows Nov. 19 at NYU's new Skirball Center. Meanwhile, Nimoy hasn't been keeping close tabs on former "Star Trek" shipmate William Shatner. The former Mr. Spock told us he was unaware that Shatner was hosting "Iron Chef USA" on the Food Network. "Bill has his own energy," Nimoy chuckled to PAGE SIX. "We're very good friends, but we don't necessarily follow what each other is doing."
Source

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 3:35 PM
(0) comments


w


Dean's Environmental Speech in SanFran.

Strange, he seems to be stealing lines from Clark. Not that there's anything wrong with that. But I wonder if they've been chatting.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 12:40 PM
(0) comments


wWednesday, July 30, 2003


The Quiet American is out on DVD this week. I saw it in the theater with Lou a few months back - probably the best movie I'd seen since The Two Towers (and I haven't seen a better one yet).

You should rent it, if you're in a movie mood any time soon.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 12:19 PM
(0) comments


w


Best Legal Document Of The Year
Yes, five months remain in the year, but we're ready to announce the winner of the prestigious 2003 Legal Document of the Year award. The below motion was filed earlier this month in connection with a criminal charge filed against a Colorado teenager. The boy's troubles started when he was confronted at school by a vice principal who suspected that he had been smoking in the boys bathroom. When presented to the principal, the kid exploded, cursing the administrator with some variants of the "F" word. For his outburst, the boy was hit with a disorderly conduct rap, which was eventually amended to interfering with the staff, faculty, or students of an educational institutional. Faced with what he thought was a speech crime, Eric Vanatta, the teen's public defender, drafted the below motion to dismiss the misdemeanor charge. The District Court document is an amusing and profane look at the world's favorite four-letter word, from its origins in 1500 to today's frequent use of the term by Eminem, Chris Rock, and Lenny Kravitz. The criminal charge, Vanatta argued in the motion, was not warranted since the use of the popular curse is protected by the First Amendment. TSG's favorite part of the motion is the chart comparing Google results for the "F" word and other all-American terms like mom, baseball, and apple pie. Sadly, Vanatta never got the chance to argue his motion before a judge. Because ten days ago he cut a plea deal that deferred prosecution of his client for four months--if the kid stays out of trouble during that period, the charge gets dismissed.
Oh, you have got to read this. I love lawyers.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:27 AM
(0) comments


w


Bring 'em on

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:04 AM
(0) comments


w


I like Kerry, I swear.

Best damn story every written about the Kerry campaign.

Leave a comment, I'm curious what you guys are thinking every now and again.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 1:06 AM
(0) comments


wTuesday, July 29, 2003




Hee hee...

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 5:07 PM
(0) comments


w


Kickstand!

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 12:02 PM
(0) comments


w


More Fun in Texas

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:52 AM
(0) comments


w


Tuesday Krugman: You Say Tomato

Goodness me, he sure is mean to our Dear Leader.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:38 AM
(0) comments


w


The Dean of Surprises
The early line isn't good. Word from the field is that the impetuous Dean makes Bob Dole look soft and cuddly, that he's little more than a fad, and, worst of all, that he's a one-trick pony who doesn't have the legs for a long presidential run.

So I arrived up here half expecting the candidate to be disemboweling bunnies in his spare time, screaming at staff about the dripping entrails, and railing nonstop about Iraq. I expected, in short, to find someone to be dismissed.
Tee hee

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:24 AM
(0) comments


w


Slate is really out-doing Salon's coverage of the primary season this time around. When are they going to hire Jake Tapper back to do some real reporting?

Howard Dean's Low Rent Allure

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:09 AM
(0) comments


wMonday, July 28, 2003


Quote Of The Day
“In combination with Saddam,” he says. “They (Bush and Voldemort) both have selfish interests and are very much in love with power. Also, a disregard for the environment. A love for manipulating people. I read books four and five, and Fudge”—Rowling’s slippery Minister of Magic—”is similar to Tony Blair. He’s the ultimate politician. He’s in denial about many things. And everything is for the sake of his own persona, his own power. The way the Iraq thing was handled was not unlike the way Fudge handled affairs in book four.”

- New Harry Potter Director, Alfonso Cuaron


posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 4:37 PM
(0) comments


w


Two things to check out today.

1. Dean's fundraising. Check the blog. I put up another $50, in case you were wondering.

2. Learn French. Read Montreal's Indymedia.



posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:03 PM
(0) comments


wFriday, July 25, 2003


Republican-backed Head Start bill survives by one vote, Gephardt misses tally
Democratic presidential hopeful Dick Gephardt missed a House vote Friday on a Republican-backed bill that would overhaul the landmark Head Start education program, a measure that survived in the House by a hairbreadth margin.

The 217-216 Republican victory came after midnight Thursday and was so tenuous that Rep. John Sullivan, R-Okla., recovering from a car accident, was brought in by wheelchair. But Gephardt, the former House Minority leader, had left Thursday evening for a two-day campaign swing through South Carolina, and the Head Start vote became one of hundreds he has missed this year.
This sort of thing is starting to bug me. I mean, he's already said he's retiring if he doesn't win - so why doesn't he go ahead and quit now? Of course, of the nine, only one of them stepped down to run...

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 4:41 PM
(0) comments


w


People here know George Bush is a liar. Most people in meat space either trust him, or think they're all crooked and he's just one of 'em.

But that isn't true. Bush is a lot worse than most politicians in his relationship with the truth.

And Cowboy, someone is callin' you out.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:55 PM
(0) comments


w


Why Does Merle Haggard Hate America?
My closest buddy in 1951, had just got out of the Marine Corps, because they found out he was to young to be a Marine. Besides that, he received an undesirable discharge for whippin' his sergeant. He wanted to reenlist because he was now 18. He straightened up his past don't you see. I was 14 and we thought it might be better to change our names. We enlisted under the names of Bobby Eugene and Roy Leslie Davis. Point being we wanted more than anything to be Marines during the Korean conflict. My older brother James L and cousin Gerald harp were both decorated Marines and saw active battle in world war 2 in the battle of Okinawa, Iwo Jima, and Patalou, I went to both of their funerals with my family. I still get goose bumps when I think about the 21-gun salute and the Marine with a tear in his eye who handed the flag to my brother's wife, Fran. I doubt there are few who care more about the flag than I do.

I went to volunteer for the Marines at the tender age of 14 and I'm convinced I would have given my life. I'm sure if necessary. I'd do the same today. But 14-year olds don't ask questions and they certainly don't begin to understand politics. This nation has a history of being a warrior. Young men always pay the dues. And it was America's way to always be behind what America was doing. And the issues and the reasons why were always argued after the fact. Speaking of after the fact it's a national shame the way we treat our vets. You see, to be an American you want to respect everything you know about this great country. Those who have the gumption to investigate, know that the reputation of honesty between the government and the people cannot reflect the reason for a single man to have confidence in what were doing in current day conditions. I'm suspicious, I'm paranoid, and I'm afraid. And the person who says he isn't has not looked up or around lately.

I don't even know the Dixie chicks, but I find it an insult for all the men and women who fought and died in past wars when almost the majority of America jumped down their throats for voicing an opinion. It was like a verbal witch-hunt and lynching. Whether I agree with their comments or not has no bearing. And in the same breath let me say that I have become a fan of this new little kid, Toby Keith. There is some humor in me calling Toby Keith little. God bless this great country and I pray he keeps a close eye on us in these last days. And God knows the headlines of today surely indicate that were living in that time now. Seems lately we're awfully quick to criticize and pleased with ourselves to be part of the majority. As a country we need to look inward for the answers to the energy of the future. We need to bring down our demands for oil, rebuild some bridges and highways and allow the farmers to grow something that replenishes the soil. Those who don't know what that is, should do some research. The problem is not in Iraq and the answers are not in Iran. I hope were not buried alive beneath this pending financial collapse if the pipeline doesn't get through. Surely everything doesn't depend on oil!

- Merle Haggard June 2003


posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:44 PM
(0) comments


w


Good letter to Greens by Kucinich. If we're going to beat George Bush, we have to find a way to come together as a party large enough for Dennis Kucinich and Joe Lieberman to sit on a stage together and both belong. I don't think the Democrats have done that yet - I don't think the Democratic party has been a united majority party since Harry Truman desegregated the military.

Of course, we gotta stamp the Greens out if they run a candidate again in 2004, Corleone style.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 2:40 PM
(0) comments


w


This from da Horse:
Dear Esteemed Horse:

Let's see, during her homecoming yesterday Private Lynch thanked Sen. John Rockefeller, a Democrat, and Gov. Bob Wise, also a Democrat.

She thanked her boyfriend. She paid tribute to her fellow soldiers. She even thanked the Iraqi people who helped her survive.

There was one name that was glaringly omitted, however. That would be none other than her Commander-in-Chief.

Nicely done, soldier.

Best regards,
Ron Shapella
West Amwell Township, NJ
Poor kid from West Virginia (Byrd is the word) joins the army for college money so she can be a teacher? Sounds like a Republican to me.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 12:57 PM
(0) comments


w


This deserves to be on the front page. C/o Mr. Meyers:
we get tax cut!
tv turn on.
it's you.
how are you citizens!
all your cash are belong to us
what you say!
you are on the way to deflation
you have no chance to survive make your time
ha ha
There's more that could be done with this... know anyone experienced in Techno re-mixes?

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 11:50 AM
(0) comments


w


Right, so Gary Trudeau has a Q&A thing on the Doonesbury site that he updates fairly frequently. Today's is great:
Q. What's up with Trudeau running a big Howard Dean campaign the last few weeks. Is Trudeau in the tank?
-- M. Mahoney, Sacramento, CA



A. Damn near. Here's the skinny for full-disclosure buffs: GBT and Dr. Dean were childhood buddies and college classmates. During a wrestling tournament, the feeble Trudeau pinned the athletic Dean twice, an humiliation (attention, biographers) that has haunted Dean ever since. After graduating from college, the two pretty much lost track of one another until Dean became governor of Vermont and told a reporter that he'd developed his sense of humor hanging out with Trudeau. Trudeau wrote him to protest, because when the two had been tight as teenagers, GBT didn't actually have a sense of humor. This may explain why reporters don't think Dean has one, either. Actually he does, at least around Trudeau, so GBT gave him $2000 (maxing out early) on the promise of relief from daily Dean For America fundraising spam, a promise that his friend has yet to make good on. Dean has also refused to soften his position on gun control, drug reform, or any other issue of importance to GBT, so a lot of good it's done.


posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:49 AM
(0) comments


w


Krugman For Fed Chief!

Dropping the Bonds

Someone set us up the bond. All your base are belong to Greenspan.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:24 AM
(0) comments


wThursday, July 24, 2003


Someone read this, I'm busy moving.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 4:10 PM
(0) comments


w


US to report on 9/11 failings
The report will criticise the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) but will conclude they had no evidence that gave specific warnings about the attacks, leaks to the American media suggest.

The 900-page report is expected to provide details of missed opportunities to disrupt the terror plot by denying entry to the hijackers and keeping them under surveillance.

The report was completed in December, but it has taken until now for it to be declassified.

But it reportedly leaves unanswered questions about whether Saudi Arabia funded or had any knowledge of the al-Qaeda hijackers, 15 of whom were Saudi nationals.

The Bush administration has refused to declassify 28 pages of the report that deals with the actions of the Saudis and other foreign governments.

Senator Bob Graham, one of the leaders of the joint House and Senate investigation, and a Democrat who wants to challenge President George W Bush for the White House next year, has accused the administration of protecting foreign governments.
If they lied about Iraq, what else would they lie about?

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 12:19 PM
(0) comments


w


More celebrity Dean news... he counts Mel Brooks as a backer as well.

posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:08 AM
(0) comments


wWednesday, July 23, 2003


More Durbin Action

It gets even better (see article below). I queried Thomas (the Congressional Record Service) to find out what my Senator actually said yesterday (can I mention again that I voted for him?). I'm quoting the whole thing, because you should read it.
Mr. DURBIN . Mr. President, last week there was a historic meeting of the Senate Intelligence Committee, of which I am a member. Director Tenet of the Central Intelligence Agency came before us. There has been a lot written and said about that meeting of the Intelligence Committee.

I think what is important is we reflect on what has occurred since that meeting because I think it speaks volumes about where we are in America when it comes to the issue of being critical of this administration, its policies, and its use of intelligence.

At issue, of course, were 16 words in the President's State of the Union Address last January. This address on January 28 included the following statement by the President of the United States:
The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.
This sentence was part of a speech delivered by the President, the most important speech any President delivers in the course of a given year, at a time in our Nation's history when we were asked to rally behind our troops and our President to invade the nation of Iraq. This was a moment, of course, of great consequence because not only was America's foreign policy about to be decided in relation to the Middle East, but families across America were going to be asked to send their sons and daughters, husbands and wives, and loved ones into harm's way. The words have to be measured carefully because the consequences of those words are so serious.

Many people have said, What was wrong with the President's statement? The British intelligence was insisting that they had evidence that, in fact, Iraq had tried to obtain uranium, fissile material to build nuclear weapons from Niger, an African nation. It turns out there was much more to the story. In addition to the efforts of British intelligence , our own intelligence agencies had been looking closely at the same issue and had come to the opposite conclusion. They decided that the evidence presented did not make the case. In fact, in October of 2002, when President Bush was going to give a very important speech in Cincinnati, OH, outlining the reasons he believed we should be mindful of the threat of Iraq, White House staffers--Mr. Hadley, who was with the security portion of the White House--wanted to include in that speech the same reference to this sale of uranium from Niger to Iraq. He was cautioned by the Central Intelligence Agency in October not to include it because the sources of the information , according to the American intelligence agency, were not credible; the claim was dubious. So the charge was taken out of the President's Cincinnati speech in October.

Then comes the President's State of the Union Address in January. Once again, the same White House staff--I am not alluding to Mr. Hadley again, but someone on the White House staff came forward and said these words should be included, even after being warned 3 months earlier that they were not accurate.

So Director Tenet came before us last week to explain what happened, why words that were disqualified from the President's earlier speech were then included in this State of the Union Address. As the Director came before us, we knew several things. A week before, the President of the United States said the words should not have been included in the speech, and Director of the CIA, Mr. Tenet, said he took personal responsibility for not removing them; that the Central Intelligence Agency, responsible for reviewing that kind of wording in the speech, should have stopped the President from using those remarks a second time in the State of the Union Address.

I said publicly and on the floor of the Senate that what Director Tenet told us was important, but equally important was the question as to what individual or group of individuals within the White House was so adamant in their pursuit of including this important language in the speech, in the President's State of the Union Address--particularly after the White House had been told not to say that in an earlier Presidential speech.

I made that point after the hearing. I certainly did not disclose the name of the White House employee given to us during the course of the Intelligence Committee hearing. I said, as I believe now, that as a result of that hearing it was clear that when we make this inquiry, all roads lead to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. We have to really look to the White House staff and the role they played in pushing for and putting this language in the speech which led the President to mislead the American people.

I have said and repeated, there is no evidence or indication that President Bush knew this statement was wrong--none. If that comes out at some later time, so be it.

I am not making any allegation about the President's motive of including it. But I will say this, unequivocally. The President was let down by his staff in the White House. They had a responsibility to make certain what he said to the American people was true, and they knew better. In October, they had been warned by the CIA that this information was not accurate, was dubious, could not be backed up. Yet they persisted in January in including these same remarks.

After I made the statement, it was interesting the reaction from the White House. The next day, the White House Press Secretary, Mr. Scott McClellan, called my claims nonsense and went on to say that because I voted against the use of force resolution when it came to the invasion of Iraq when it was before the Senate last October, that I was, in fact, trying to justify my vote by the statements I was making.

That was the White House interpretation of my remarks. They did not go to the heart of the issue, obviously, as to whether there was anyone in the White House staff insistent or persistent when it came to including these remarks and what action might be taken by the White House to take that staffer off the case, perhaps to remove them completely from the White House because they had misled the President. No, that was not the issue. The issue was this Senator and my credibility. Well, I understand that. Politics isn't a bean bag. I was not born yesterday. You have to have a tough mental hide if you are going to aspire to this office and be in a national debate. But it was interesting, on the first day, when the time came to address the issue, instead of attacking the problem, they attacked me. So be it.

But then there was more to follow. On the following day, on Friday, the White House press operation started floating the story that there were Senators in this Chamber who were asking for my removal from the Senate Intelligence Committee because of the statements I had made. And when pressed as to what those statements were, the White House said DURBIN has disclosed classified information and, therefore, should be removed from the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Now, that is a very serious charge. I can think of perhaps only once or twice in my entire congressional career that I have ever heard a similar charge. So, of course, the reporters who called said to the White House: What did he disclose? And they said two things: First, he disclosed the name of the White House staffer who was responsible for writing this speech. And, secondly, on the floor of the Senate, at this very desk, he said there were 550 suspected sites of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq identified by the U.S. Government before our invasion.

The White House said: Both of those items are classified, DURBIN disclosed them, and he should leave the Intelligence Committee.

Well, the facts are these: No. 1, I never disclosed the name of the White House staffer--to this day--who was involved in the preparation of the speech. And, secondly, the information I gave on the floor of 500 suspected sites of weapons of mass destruction had been declassified a month earlier, declassified and made public. So the White House allegations to back up my removal from the Intelligence Committee, attacking my credibility, saying that I disclosed classified information , were, in fact, false and inaccurate.

Sadly, what we have here is a continuing pattern by this White House. If any Member of this Senate--Democrat or Republican--takes to the floor, questions this White House policy, raises any questions about the gathering of intelligence information , or the use of it, be prepared for the worst. This White House is going to turn on you and attack you. They are going to question your patriotism. They are going to question the fact of whether or not you are living up to your oath of office here in the Senate. And they are going to question as to whether or not you belong in this debate on intelligence ; whether, for instance, you should be a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee. I think that is a very serious outcome. It is one that all of us should reflect on for a moment.
Then, continuing to play the game balls to the wall, Durbin inserts the entirety of Paul Krugman's column from yesterday ("Who's Unpatriotic Now?") into the congressional record. Yes, he's that cool. Continuing...
Mr. DURBIN . This morning, in the New York Times, Paul Krugman wrote about another episode. I would like to read from it because I think it indicates what I have been through over the past several days is not unique.

We are aware of the fact that Ambassador Joe Wilson, who has served the United States, was called on by this administration to go to Africa and to establish whether or not the sale of uranium took place. He came back, and it is my understanding he made an oral report to the administration questioning whether or not there was any background evidence to support the claim that Iraq had tried to obtain or had obtained uranium fissile material from Niger. He made the report to the administration, which is part of the cumulative evidence of the weakness of this assertion by British intelligence .

And, of course, a week or two ago, in the New York Times, Ambassador Wilson published a column indicating the timeline and substance of his involvement with this issue, and making it clear that based on the request of the administration, he had gone to Africa, came back with the information , and told the administration he could not make this claim.

Let me read from Paul Krugman's article today about Ambassador Joe Wilson and what has happened to him since he went public with the fact that he had warned this administration that saying anything about the uranium coming from Africa was really not credible, of dubious background. Here is what Krugman writes:

And while we're on the subject of patriotism, let's talk about the affair of Joseph Wilson's wife. Mr. Wilson is the former ambassador who was sent to Niger by the C.I.A. to investigate reports of attempted Iraqi uranium purchases and who recently went public with his findings. Since then administration allies have sought to discredit him--it's unpleasant stuff. But here's the kicker: both the columnist Robert Novak and Time magazine say that administration officials told them that they believed that Mr. Wilson had been chosen through the influence of his wife, whom they identified as a C.I.A. operative.

Think about that: if their characterization of Mr. Wilson's wife is true .....
And Krugman writes that Wilson refuses to confirm or deny it--
Bush administration officials have exposed the identity of a covert operative. That happens to be a criminal act; it's also definitely unpatriotic.

So why would they do such a thing? Partly, perhaps, to punish Mr. Wilson, but also to send a message.

And that should alarm us. We've just seen how politicized, cooked intelligence can damage our national interest. Yet the Wilson affair suggests that the administration intends to continue pressuring analysts to tell it what it wants to hear.
End of quote from this Krugman article.

Mr. President, I am going to ask the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee and the ranking member to investigate this matter. This is an extremely serious situation. If, in fact, administrative officials have publicly disclosed the identity of Mr. Wilson's wife, who is allegedly, according to these news articles, working for the CIA, this is an extremely serious matter. In their effort to seek political revenge against Ambassador Wilson for his column, they are now attacking him and his wife, and doing it in a fashion that is not only unacceptable, it may be criminal. And that, frankly, is as serious as it gets in this town.

I would say to my colleagues in the Senate, understand what this is all about. If you come to the floor of this Senate, or stand before a microphone, and are critical of this administration for their policy or use of intelligence, be prepared for the worst. You are in for a rough ride.

Certainly what happened to me was minor league compared to what happened to Ambassador Wilson. In my situation, they merely questioned my integrity and asked I be removed from the Senate Intelligence Committee. In Mr. Wilson's situation, they have set out to destroy the career of his wife. That speaks volumes of where this administration has gone when it comes to this essential issue.

People have asked me: Why are 16 words so important? Why does it make any difference if the President happened to make a mistake? And maybe technically he didn't. He attributed this information to British intelligence. Tony Blair was here last week and says he still stands by it.

I think it is important in this respect: We spend billions of dollars each year accumulating important intelligence information to protect America. We can count on the dedicated men and women in intelligence agencies around the United States and around the world to keep us safe. They risk their lives to do it. They are as fine and patriotic as any man or woman who has ever served this country in uniform. And they try to bring this gathered information together, to sift through it, establish what is credible and what is not, and to alert the policy leaders--the President and others--as to the steps we need to take as a nation to defend ourselves.

That is always an important job, but in a war on terrorism it is essential. That intelligence becomes increasingly important. Without that intelligence data, how can we possibly protect this Nation from another 9/11?

Second, there is a question as well; that is, not only whether we are gathering accurate intelligence but whether that intelligence that we have gathered and that information is being accurately and honestly reported to the American people. What is at issue is not just the intelligence data but the honesty and credibility of the policymakers who use it and portray it.

The question we have before us is whether the intelligence information in this important statement about nuclear weapons in Iraq was somehow spun, hyped, or exaggerated. If that is true, what was the motive? How far up the chain does it go? Is it only one zealous White House staffer who was trying his best to put this information in a speech or is it more? It is an important question. It is one which I am certain the administration doesn't want to face. But in this age where intelligence is more important than ever, it has to be faced.

Let me go into the chronology of how the White House has responded as we have questioned whether those 16 words should have been included in the State of the Union Address. This is over a span of about 5 or 6 weeks.

On June 8, 2003, on Meet the Press, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice said that the uranium claim in the State of the Union address was "mistaken," but that the White House had not known about intelligence doubts until afterward. Rice claimed, "We did not know at the time--no one knew at the time, in our circles--maybe someone knew down in the bowels of the agency, but no one in our circles knew that there were doubts and suspicions that this might be a forgery." Since then, it has been shown that the National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice was indeed aware of deep doubts regarding this claim. In fact, the CIA prevented one of Dr. Rice's chief deputies from including the uranium reference in an October 2002 speech the President gave in Cincinnati.

When Dr. Rice said on June 8, 2003, on "Meet the Press" that, "We did not know at the time--no one knew at the time in our circles" that there were opportunities and suspicions that this might be a forgery, that ran in direct contradiction of the simple facts that have been disclosed. The CIA had advised the White House and the national security portion of the White House not to include the same words in the speech 3 months earlier.

Let us go to July 7, 2003.

Prompted by a New York Times op-ed article in which Joseph Wilson, former U.S. ambassador to Gabon, contended that the Bush administration ignored--and possibly manipulated--his findings regarding an Iraq-Niger uranium connection, the White House acknowledged that Bush should not have made the claim because of concerns about the intelligence behind it. Then White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer tried to shut down the story in its tracks, insisting it was old news.

On July 10, 2003--Four days into the controversy, as Bush was dogged with questions while visiting Africa, Secretary of State Colin Powell said there was no intention to deceive and called the outcry "overwrought and overblown and overdrawn." In defending the process by which the President allowed such a statement in the State of the Union speech, he said "There was sufficient evidence floating around at the time that such a statement was not totally outrageous."

Is that the standard? It was not totally outrageous?

Frankly, it is interesting that a few days after the President's State of the Union Address when Secretary of State Colin Powell was in careful preparation of his presentation before the United Nations Security Council, he consciously decided not to include that same reference in the speech to the United Nations Security Council. He knew better, and he knew that the standard of credibility of America is not whether something is or is not totally outrageous.

On July 11, 2003: first Condoleezza Rice, then President Bush himself, pointed fingers at the CIA for not removing the claim while vetting the speech.

Rice:
There was even some discussion on that specific sentence, so that it reflected better what the CIA thought. And the speech was cleared. Now, I can tell you, if the CIA, the director of Central Intelligence , had said, "Take this out of the speech," it would have been gone, without question.
President Bush said:
I gave a speech to the nation that was cleared by the intelligence services. And it was a speech that detailed to the American people the dangers posed by the Saddam Hussein regime.
At that point, July 11, CIA Director George Tenet made his statement concerning this particular episode. He said in a statement that CIA officials reviewing the draft remarks of the State of the Union "raised several concerns about the fragmentary nature of the intelligence with National Security Council colleagues. Some of the language was changed." The change included using British intelligence as the source of the information . The CIA, however, continued to doubt the reliability of the British claim, and in fact doubted the credibility of the statement made by the President of the United States, which is certainly asserting the same claim.

Between July 11 and July 14, a new line of defense was established by the White House. Dr. Rice and Secretary of Defense Don Rumsfeld appeared on three Sunday talk shows to offer a new explanation: Bush's remark was technically accurate because he correctly described what British intelligence had reported:
It turns out that it's technically correct what the president said, that the UK did say that and still says that. Even though the words should not have been included in the speech, they're not necessarily inaccurate. The British say they believe that it is accurate, and that may very well be the case. We will just have to wait and see.
Dancing on the head of a pin, the Secretary of Defense, moving back and forth between whether this statement is accurate or not, says that the British intelligence discredited by our intelligence agency said maybe we have to take a wait-and-see attitude and see maybe if they are right and maybe if they are wrong.

Again, is that the standard for statements by the President of the United States in preparation for a war where we are about to risk American lives? I certainly hope the standard is much higher.

On Monday, July 14, White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer emphasized that the British could be right. He said:
We don't know if [British intelligence claims were] true but nobody--but nobody--can say it was wrong. The fact of the matter is whether they sought it from Africa or didn't seek it from Africa doesn't change the fact that they were seeking to reconstitute a nuclear program.
That was a statement made in his Monday press briefing. Now they are basically saying it really doesn't make any difference whether what we said was truthful or not. According to Ari Fleischer, we all knew they were setting out to reconstitute a nuclear program. But it turned out that this was one of the two major pillars the Bush administration was using to argue that nuclear weapons were a threat from Iraq.

First, the aluminum tube controversy, which went in circles many times as to whether or not these tubes would be used for nuclear weapons or conventional munitions and the fissile material and uranium coming from Africa. What we have here is a situation where they are trying to build the case, and build it with the shakiest evidence already discredited by the CIA and other intelligence agencies.

Between July 10 and July 18, there came a new strategy from the White House on the issue.

Scott McClellan, who succeeded Fleischer as White House spokesman, also tried to dismiss questions. Over four days, he told reporters 20 times that the particular question they were asking had already been "addressed."

On July 16, 2003, Scott McClellan said claims by Senator DURBIN that White House officials applied pressure on the CIA to keep the uranium reference in the speech were "nonsense" and accused skeptics of trying to "politicize this issue by rewriting history." At the same time, the White House tried to redirect the debate onto the overall danger posed by Saddam's chemical and biological weapons--uranium or not--and onto Bush's resolve in acting to confront that threat.

On July 17, 2003, McClellan cautioned that Senator DURBIN --and possibly other Democrats--were "lying about the little things" related to CIA Director George Tenet's testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee. The "little thing" was whether Tenet has named names of these responsible at the White House.

Although I refused to disclose any names mentioned by the CIA Director, I will say this: I stand by my statement.

Let me explain for a moment the issue at hand. We have made it clear that Director Tenet would appear before the Intelligence Committee. That was public knowledge. The fact is that Director Tenet sat at the committee table in the Senate Intelligence Committee with several people from his agency. What he said, of course, was given to the members of committee. Questions from members of the committee were directed to appropriate members of the staff, and he would indicate which member might give an answer to a question.

I took great care in commenting about his testimony to limit any reference to anyone in the room, specifically to Director Tenet, so that I would not even disclose the names of the CIA employees who were in the room. Perhaps I was over cautious. But that caution on my part was then used against me by the White House. Because when we asked Director Tenet pointblank who was the White House staffer responsible for the State of the Union Address--in fact, it has now been publicly disclosed by the CIA and others--he turned to Alan Foley, an assistant who worked on the speech, and Allen Foley gave the name to the committee with a nod by Director Tenet. So my caution and care not to even disclose the name of Alan Foley who sat at the table with the CIA Director was turned and used against me by the White House, saying that I was lying to the American public as to whether Director Tenet disclosed the name.

The fact is, Director Tenet was testifying. He turned to Mr. Foley, his assistant, who said the name. Whether Director Tenet repeated the name, only the record of the hearing can reflect. But what I was establishing was the fact that the identity of the person involved was disclosed during Director Tenet's testimony. I stand by that.

On July 18, on Friday, the White House press staff began leaking word that one of the leading White House opponents, Senator Durbin of Illinois, had released classified material regarding names of those involved in the controversy and the number of suspected WMD sites in Iraq. As a result, the White House said some Senators were contemplating having me, Senator Durbin , removed from the Intelligence Committee.

Our office pointed out to reporters that no classified material had been released by this Senator. I had refused to name the White House staffer or characterize specific witness testimony. And the number of suspected Iraqi WMD sites, 550, which I disclosed on the Senate floor, had been declassified this year in June. It is public information .

The White House, when they were confronted with the fact that their accusations against me were not true said, they would "Look into that."

After attacking my honesty and integrity and suggesting I be removed from the Senate Intelligence Committee, they were unable to produce any evidence of the disclosure of classified information . I have gone to great lengths to avoid that, and I will continue.

Then on July 18, that same day, the White House took the rare step of declassifying and releasing eight pages of a 90-page top secret national intelligence estimate that was used to write the questioned portions of the State of the Union Address. Instead of putting a lid on the controversy, the document showed prewar divisions within the U.S. intelligence community that were glossed over by administration spokesmen. The State Department, for instance, termed the reports that Saddam Hussein was shopping for uranium in Africa as "highly dubious."

That is the chronology. It is an important chapter in our political history. It is an important chapter in the history of the collection and use of intelligence here in the United States.

I am glad the Senate Intelligence Committee will continue its investigation. It is my understanding the chairman and ranking Democrat have said they will call White House staffers before the committee to ask what led up to this situation and why we are in the position we are today.

I can recall times in the past when the Intelligence Committee and its members had been challenged as to whether they disclosed classified information and called on to take polygraphs for fear they may have said something that was top secret and should not be public knowledge. I understand the concern of the administration. That should be the concern of every American. We have to take care not to disclose classified information .

But I have to ask the obvious question: How can this administration declassify things, drop certain items into the press that are complimentary and positive from their point of view and get away with it and not be held to the same standard as members of the committee? When we are in a situation where we are given a body of information and draw a conclusion from that but cannot speak to that publicly, while the administration discretely drops into the public domain information they think is helpful to their side of the case, that is a one-sided argument. It does not serve this Nation well, and the administration is pushing the envelope when they do it.

I am glad the Senate Intelligence Committee is going forward. There is a lot more we need to do. I will say to my colleagues in the Senate, please do not back off from our responsibility. We have a responsibility to the people who elect us and to the American people at large to hold this administration--indeed, every administration--accountable for honesty and accuracy when they speak to the American people, particularly in areas of the discussion of intelligence information which could lead to military action which could, in fact, endanger the lives of Americans and their families. That is our most serious and sacred duty. We should not back off of it because of threats from the White House or efforts by the White House to silence us.

I yield the floor.

The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from Delaware.

Mr. CARPER. Mr. President, before Senator Durbin leaves the floor, I want to say that the concerns he has raised are serious and grave. They deserve serious attention, not just of this body but of the people in this country. I thank him for bringing them to us today and join him in voicing the gravity of the situation. The kind of actions he has described, if they are true, should not be permitted. They should not be countenanced.


posted by Matthew Carroll-Schmidt at 10:45 AM
(0) comments